The derivative
The limit of a rate of change, and why eˣ is its own derivative.
about 9 min
Start from a problem
An object's position is . Its average velocity from to is But what we really want to ask is: at the instant , how fast is it going?
An instant has no length; at the quotient is . Yet "instantaneous speed" clearly means something: the speedometer shows it. So we are forced to consider the limit of the average velocity as . If that limit exists, it deserves the name instantaneous velocity: The derivative is not a notation handed down from above; it is the only reasonable answer to the question "what is the rate of change right now?"
Play first, read later. Below are and its difference quotient Drag the base and make the step small. The difference-quotient curve always looks like itself, just taller or shorter. Is there a base for which the two curves coincide exactly?
The difference-quotient curve is a constant multiple of ; the constant depends only on and . As it tends to some number depending only on . increases with : about at , about at . So between and there should be a unique with . We call it .
First a geometric look: shrink the distance between two points and the secant turns into the tangent.
Definition
Let be defined on a neighbourhood of . If the limit exists, is differentiable at and is its derivative there.
Geometrically the difference quotient is the slope of a secant and the derivative the slope of the tangent. Physically, average velocity and instantaneous velocity. The definition contains one limit and nothing else.
is the unique positive real number with .
This looks engineered to make true, and that is exactly what it is. We now show such a number exists, is unique, and identify it.
Derivation
For ,
The first equality is the factorisation seen in the experiment: .
For the second we need . Put , so and as . Then using , which is equivalent to , the other common definition .
So , and . The "coincidence" you saw in the experiment is .
Basic rules and their proofs
Let be differentiable at . Then
- ;
- ;
- if , ;
- (chain rule) if is differentiable at and at , then .
We prove the product rule; the method is the same add-and-subtract trick as for products of limits. As the first term tends to (differentiability of implies continuity, so ) and the second to .
If is differentiable at , then is continuous at .
.
The converse fails: is continuous at but not differentiable; the one-sided difference quotients tend to and .
is a number; is a function. In the point is fixed and is what moves. Writing "" means: for every , this limit was computed, and it happened to equal .
Applications
says: the rate of change is proportional to the current value, with constant 1. Any process whose growth rate is proportional to its size (compound interest, populations, radioactive decay, a discharging capacitor) is solved by . This is the first equation, , in What is an ODE.
From and ,
Observe → conjecture → define → derive → prove → apply. We did not start from "". We first saw that a special base exists, then defined it, then proved it is the base of . A definition is the tidying-up of a conclusion, not something handed down from above.